Groundbreaking research by scientists from Trinity College Dublin has found that exposure to nanomaterials can have a serious health impacts, potentially causing rheumatoid arthritis and the development of other serious autoimmune diseases. The research raises serious concerns about the widespread use of nanomaterials in consumer products and the way that these substances are currently manufactured, handled and disposed of. It also illustrates the need for a mandatory register of nanomaterials, so that these substances can be tracked and appropriately handled throughout the supply chain.

Polluted-air contains thousands of health-damaging nanoparticles. These tiny pollutants are able to penetrate deeply into the lungs and are an important factor in the development of various diseases. Exposure to car exhaust fumes and cigarette smoke have long been recognised as risk factors causing chronic inflammation in the lungs. It has also been established that smoking can also trigger undesirable immune reactions. This can lead to the development of autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, which incapacitates millions of people worldwide. Recently, new concerns have been raised regarding the emerging products of nanotechnology which, if not handled appropriately, may contribute to the generation of new types of airborne pollutants. Therefore, the importance of identifying risks and hazards involved in the manufacturing, handling, use, and disposal of nanomaterials cannot be overestimated.

In their research, the Nanomedicine and Molecular Imaging team at Trinity College Dublin’s School of Medicine led by Professor Yuri Volkov investigated whether there was a common underlying mechanism contributing to the development of autoimmune diseases in human cells following their exposure to a wide range of nanoparticles containing different physical and chemical properties.

The scientists applied a wide range of nanomaterials including ultrafine carbon black, carbon nanotubes and silicon dioxide particles of different sizes, ranging from 20 to 400 nanometres, to human white blood cells and cells derived from the lining of the airway passages.

At the same time, collaborating researchers from the Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health (Morgantown, WV, USA) exposed mice to chronic inhalation of air contaminated with single walled carbon nanotubes.

The result was clear and convincing: all types of nanomaterials in the Irish and US study caused an identical response in human cells and in the lungs of mice. This resulted in the transformation of the amino acid arginine into a molecule called citrulline (termed citrullination). Once arginine has been transformed into citrulline, human proteins which incorporate this modified amino acid as building blocks, can no longer function properly and are subject to destruction and elimination by the body’s defence system. Furthermore, once programmed to get rid of citrullinated proteins, the immune system can start attacking its own tissues and organs, thereby causing the autoimmune processes which may result in rheumatoid arthritis.

Commenting on the significance of the findings, Trinity College Dublin’s Professor Volkov says that the research establishes a clear link between autoimmune diseases and nanomaterials.

So what is our Government doing?

Despite the growing body of evidence that nanomaterials behave differently to bulk forms of the same chemicals and may be cause serious health effects, in Australia nano versions of existing chemicals do not require separate safety assessments. This means that there are literally hundreds of consumer products out there containing unregulated and untested nanoparticles.

Furthermore, while other countries such as France and the Netherlands are in the process of introducing mandatory notification and registration for commercial use of manufactured nanomaterials the Australian Federal Government is still sitting on its hands.

Recently the Federal Government made public a report it commissioned on the feasibility of implementing a mandatory nanotechnology product registry.  The report concluded that “the feasibility of a nanoproduct registry is questionable”. This is despite the fact that France has already adopted a mandatory register for nanomaterials, with the first reporting year to be 2013.

The Government commissioned the report following pressure from the Greens to introduce a national, publicly accessible, mandatory register for all manufactured nanomaterials in commercial use.

Australian regulators currently have very limited information about the actual commercial use of nanomaterials. Responses to calls for voluntary information have been very low. A 2008 call from our chemical regulator NICNAS for information from industry on the use of nanomaterials resulted in just 7 responses.

A register is required to enable accurate supply chain tracking of nanomaterials. This is vital to enable effective risk identification and risk management by workers, employers and the public.

Calls for a publicly accessible national mandatory register of companies dealing with manufactured nanomaterials, and of nanomaterials in commercial use have been made by the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) and the Australian Nano Business Forum (ANBF).

The 2008 NSW Parliamentary Inquiry into Nanotechnology also recommended that a national mandatory labelling scheme be put in place for all manufactured nanomaterials used in the workplace.  This is in contrast to the Federal Government, which says it will not be introducing new regulations.

Listen to The World Today story on this topic